Should college athletes receive payment?

December 26, 2018

College athletes should not receive payment

It’s been the topic of ACT writing prompts, debated in newspapers and talk shows, and a frequent topic of conversation around football playoffs and March Madness season: should college athletes be paid?

College athletes are students that have been recruited or walked-on to college sports teams. They spend their time in the classroom, at the weight room, or on the field; balancing the demands of college with their busy sports schedules. All colleges are broken down into National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sections, division I, II, and III. Division I schools are typically larger, both student body and budget wise, and they also give out the most athletic scholarships. The further down the division, the less budget and scholarships the colleges have to work with. Division III schools give out no scholarships, but they are the largest of the NCAA divisions. According to CBS, 69% of the American public is against paying student-athletes additional funds on top of their scholarships benefits; and for good reasons.

A majority of college athletes already receive scholarships which cover the cost of their education. While many student-athletes will not receive full scholarships, they can reap certain benefits given to student-athletes that help cover the costs of housing, dining, and other expenses like textbooks. Because of these scholarships and other benefits, college athletes have far fewer student loans and other expenses to pay off than regular students. According to the U.S News, a typical athletic scholarship is around $10,400. Between Division I and II schools, nearly 150,000 scholarships are given out each year, costing the NCAA $2.9 billion.

Paying student-athletes would become difficult for colleges in the long run. Paying student-athletes brings into question how much student-athletes would get paid and how would the finances be distributed. Not to mention, smaller sports teams might be cut from the college programs because of their displaced finances money. This would take away opportunities from other athletes, who worked just as hard to earn their right to play at the college level. Joel Mendelson, a writer for the University Wire, noted that, “It’s unfair and wrong to pay football and men’s basketball players because they participate in a sport that generates millions of dollars in revenue, but not pay the thousands upon thousands of student-athletes competing for their schools in other sports.”

Paying student-athletes would also affect Title IX, as it brings into question whether female athletes be paid just as much as the male athletes. It remains a fact that the biggest revenue generating sports in the NCAA are men’s football and basketball. This is because these sports generate the most media coverage and “airtime” compared to other college sports. Unfortunately, many female sports team are stuck in a vicious cycle of not generating enough media coverage, which in turn leads to fewer fans. Take, for instance, the 2013 Gopher Women’s Hockey team, who ended their season with sixty-two game winning streak which included a national championship and stretched for more than two and a half seasons. Only after the streak ended did they receive a front page article in the newspaper. Since then, they have gone on to win two more national championships, neither of which were televised, not even on local channels. Mendelson again questioned the idea of the equitably of paying male versus female athletes, questioning that, “Is it right for a star football player to receive a sizable salary because football makes buckets of money while a women’s lacrosse player with a 3.9 GPA gets minimum wage?”

Student-athletes should reap the benefits that they already receive from their respective universities, and enjoy their college experiences while they have them. Student-athletes are not professional athletes, much to the discretion of fans across the country, and they should not be treated as so. Colleges and the NCAA are not and should not be responsible for equitably doling out finances to schools, as they have already proven that they struggle when it comes to providing equal opportunities for student-athletes.

About the Contributors
Photo of Syd Pierre
Syd Pierre, Print Editor-in-Chief

Print Editor Syd Pierre loves spending time in nature,hanging out with her friends and family, and of course, her dogs. She’s a big fan of the Boundary...

College athletes should receive payment

Recently, successful collegiate men’s basketball teams have been caught illegally paying their recruits in order to coax them into attending their respective institutions. The University of Arizona, the University of Kansas, the University of Louisville, and North Carolina State University are among the institutions that are currently under FBI investigation. This predicament arose due to the flawed system the National Collegiate Athletic Association has in place.

There is a lot of dirty money in collegiate athletics. If colleges offered to pay a stipend to their athletes, they wouldn’t be as susceptible to bribes that could change the trajectory of their future careers. Direct payments to athletes from colleges would clean up sports through greater transparency.

First and foremost, college athletes deserve to be paid because their performance generates a huge amount of revenue for the NCAA. “The NCAA currently produces nearly $11 Billion in annual revenue from college sports – more than the estimated total league revenues of both the National Basketball Association and the National Hockey League,” an article by Forbes reported. High ratings in television have brought in billions of dollars in advertising. College football alone “pulled in more than $1 billion” this past season, according to an article by ESPN. Additionally, March Madness earns “somewhere around $900 million in revenue” for the NCAA, according to Investopedia. However, no revenue is being shared with the people who are earning it; it is going to it coaches, athletic departments, and management. Why shouldn’t college athletes receive a share of the revenue that they tirelessly work for?

Playing a sport at a division one level is more time consuming than working a full time job. “The typical Division I college football player devotes 43.3 hours per week to his sport – 3.3 more hours than the typical American work week,” according to an article by Forbes. Being a collegiate athlete is a year-round commitment, with an arduous work schedule.“In some way [the NCAA] is taking advantage of college athletes that sign their name into a certain school,” AJ McCarron, a former starting quarterback for Alabama, explained.

Athletes make sacrifices in order to compete and make money for their university. “The NCAA’s own tournament schedules requires college athletes to miss classes for nationally televised games that bring in revenue,” Forbes stated. Athletes are not able to be typical students. They miss out on extracurricular activities like clubs, Greek life, and performances.

The increase in revenue that sports provide allows for an improved college atmosphere for all students. The money that athletes earn for their school not only goes back to improve their own team, but also provides Title IX opportunities–the same number of athletic scholarships that are offered to women as men–and finances the equipment, professors, and housing a college possesses. Many students look to attend a school with school spirit and a vibrant sports culture, which is provided by college athletics. Not nearly as many students would consider attending the University of Alabama if not for their football team. The same is true for winning programs all across the nation.

The National College Players Association reported that 86 percent of college athletes live below the poverty line. Paying these athletes would reduce the income inequality. Receiving a full ride to attend college is not substantial enough; they do not have any spending money or any time to work a part time job. All-American linebacker Donnie Edwards said “I didn’t have enough money to buy food.” The NCAA then suspended Edwards after an agent left groceries on his doorstep for violating NCAA policies of accepting a gift from an agent. “For those of you who think the life of a college athlete is all glitter and glamour…it was mostly holing up in the dorms at night because you couldn’t afford to go out,” Kareem Abdul-Jabbar stated in an article by The Guardian. With billions of dollars in revenue, surely the players deserve a piece of the pie. In no other industry would we consider it proper to not pay the workers.

The time has come to start paying college athletes for their contributions. The NCAA, with all of its resources, needs to compensate athletes for their labor by setting up a formal system. It is not only fair, but it is the right thing to do.

About the Contributors
Photo of Jack Marker
Jack Marker, Online Editor-in-Chief

“Black” Jack Marker is an excellent poker player. It is widely believed that he will end up working in Las Vegas. He is known to have taken a chance...

Edina Zephyrus • Copyright 2023 • FLEX WordPress Theme by SNOLog in